Comments for theConstitutional.org http://www.theconstitutional.org constitutional news & analysis Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:57:42 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on Friday round-up by Beldar http://www.theconstitutional.org/2010/06/11/friday-round-up-3/comment-page-1/#comment-146 Beldar Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:57:42 +0000 http://www.theconstitutional.org/2010/06/11/friday-round-up-3/#comment-146 You mischaracterize Prof. Volokh's post. He does provide context. It doesn't amount to, nor do I think it was intended as, a defense on the merits of the Kagan nomination. You mischaracterize Prof. Volokh’s post. He does provide context. It doesn’t amount to, nor do I think it was intended as, a defense on the merits of the Kagan nomination.

]]> Comment on Libertarianism: (Part 3) Negative Liberty and Positive Liberty in the Constitution by spinnikerca http://www.theconstitutional.org/2010/05/29/libertarianism-part-3-negative-liberty-and-positive-liberty-in-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-73 spinnikerca Sat, 29 May 2010 13:35:56 +0000 http://www.theconstitutional.org/2010/05/29/libertarianism-part-3-negative-liberty-and-positive-liberty-in-the-constitution/#comment-73 If 'positive liberty' means 'forced action or inaction', how can force be liberty? You need to define your terms. If ‘positive liberty’ means ‘forced action or inaction’, how can force be liberty?

You need to define your terms.

]]>